TO: | Honorable Patricia Harless, Chair, House Committee on Environmental Regulation |
FROM: | Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HB2499 by Smith (Relating to the use of Texas Emissions Reduction Plan funds for a drayage truck incentive program.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2014 | $0 |
2015 | $0 |
2016 | $0 |
2017 | $0 |
2018 | $0 |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from Texas Emissions Reduction Plan 5071 |
---|---|
2014 | ($5,000,000) |
2015 | ($5,000,000) |
2016 | ($5,000,000) |
2017 | ($5,000,000) |
2018 | ($5,000,000) |
The bill would make various changes to statute relating to the Texas Emissions Reduction Plan (TERP). In addition, it would establish a Drayage Truck Incentive Program (DTIP) within the TERP program. It would define "drayage activity" and "drayage truck," which would relate to seaport-related transport. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) would develop the DTIP to encourage owners to replace drayage trucks with newer drayage trucks. The TCEQ would be required to develop a program to reduce emissions from the operation of drayage trucks, and the agency would be authorized to establish a maximum cost-effectiveness amount for the DTIP.
The bill would provide that not more than $5,000,000 per fiscal year out of the General Revenue-Dedicated TERP Account No. 5071 could be used for the DTIP.
This analysis assumes that current TERP expenditures for the various programs receiving TERP allocations would continue at 2012-13 levels, and that the legislature would appropriate an additional $5.0 million per year out of the TERP Account No. 5071 for the newly-established DTIP. If no additional funds would be appropriated, then it is assumed that the TCEQ would allocate $5.0 million in existing TERP funding for the DTIP program, and that the TCEQ would thus reduce by $5.0 million the amount available for off-road heavy duty diesel truck and equipment grants.
The bill would require the TCEQ to adopt rules. In addition, the TCEQ would require additional staff resources to develop new program materials, conduct outreach and training, oversee implementation of the grant application and selection process, ensure that the contracting process is completed, and work with monitoring staff to ensure that the funded projects are monitored. This estimate assumes that such additional costs could be absorbed using existing agency resources.
Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality, 712 Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
|
LBB Staff: | UP, SZ, ZS, TL
|