LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
FISCAL NOTE, 83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 29, 2013

TO:
Honorable Jim Keffer, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB2532 by Workman (Relating to the regulation of propane distribution system retailers; authorizing a fee.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB2532, Committee Report 1st House, Substituted: a negative impact of ($695,036) through the biennium ending August 31, 2015.

The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.



Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds
2014 ($347,518)
2015 ($347,518)
2016 ($347,518)
2017 ($347,518)
2018 ($347,518)




Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) from
General Revenue Fund
1
2014 ($347,518)
2015 ($347,518)
2016 ($347,518)
2017 ($347,518)
2018 ($347,518)



Fiscal Year Change in Number of State Employees from FY 2013
2014 4.0
2015 4.0
2016 4.0
2017 4.0
2018 4.0

Fiscal Analysis

This bill would establish standards for distribution system retailers who supply propane gas to residential or commercial end users, bringing those entities under the ratemaking jurisdiction of the Railroad Commission. The bill would apply to systems that supply propane gas through a contiguous piping system to at least 10 customers. The bill would not apply to retail or wholesale sale of propane gas.

Fees charged by distribution system retailers would be regulated by statutory provisions set forth in the bill. Rate and ceiling fees on distributions system retailers would be established. In addition, the bill would prohibit the disconnection of service in certain circumstances. The bill would also provide for customer complaint handling. The Railroad Commission would be required to establish a toll-free number for customers to report service interruptions not caused by a distribution system retailer's refusal to serve. The Railroad Commission would be required to immediately investigate such reports, and the agency would be authorized to coordinate a refund to the customer, when applicable. The Railroad Commission also would be required to analyze spot prices (the average price for the two months preceding a billing month) and to post data on the agency's website.  

The bill would require the Railroad Commission to adopt rules to annually adjust price ceilings and to notify distribution system retailers of such annual price ceiling adjustments. If an entire distribution system experiences an interruption of service, the bill would authorize the Railroad Commission to assume temporary receivership of the system under certain conditions, and the agency would be authorized to temporarily designate a third party to operate the system.

The bill would require that each distribution system retailer submit to the Railroad Commission, on a quarterly basis, records of emergency and scheduled service interruptions lasting more than four hours and affecting more than two customers.

The bill would provide for a performance guarantee (surety payment) to be posted with the Railroad Commission by each distribution system retailer in an amount equal to the lesser of $3 multiplied by the number of gallons of aggregate storage capacity in all of the propane gas systems operated by the retailer or $50,000. The Railroad Commission would have the ability to call the letter of credit, and would be required to verify and adjust the amount of the surety annually.

The bill would require propane distribution system retailers to record a notice of disclosure of the existence of the propane gas system in the real property records in each county in which the retailers own or operate propane gas systems, including a map of the location of the areas the retailer serves.

The bill would take effect on September 1, 2013.


Methodology

The Railroad Commission reports that 74 propane distribution systems operated by 10 liquid propane (LP) gas licensees. This analysis assumes that those systems would have their rates set in the same way natural gas utilities have their rates set, which is by the Railroad Commission. Currently, LP-Gas licensees are subject to Railroad Commission jurisdiction only for licensing and safety.

The Railroad Commission would be expected to incur costs in assuming ratemaking jurisdiction for propane distribution systems upon passage of the bill. Costs would result from general ratemaking responsibilities, the establishment of a toll-free number, investigations by the Railroad Commission, handling customer complaints, refund coordination, the establishment of annual price ceilings, responsibilities related to the assumption of temporary receivership of systems (if applicable), monitoring ongoing activity, reviewing reports submitted to the agency by retail distribution systems, and handling financial assurance requirements established in the bill.  

It is estimated that the Railroad Commission would need 4.0 FTEs to carry out the responsibilities the agency would assume upon passage of the bill. Positions added would include a financial analyst, a research specialist, an auditor, and an attorney. Costs for the additional FTEs would total $347,518 annually. This estimate assumes such costs would be paid out of the General Revenue Fund because the bill does not provide for the recovery of costs incurred by the Railroad Commission.


Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. This analysis assumes that any costs to counties in accepting the real property records and maps as required by the bill could be recoverd by counties through the imposition of filing fees on propane distribution system retailers


Source Agencies:
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 455 Railroad Commission
LBB Staff:
UP, SZ, ZS, TL