Honorable John Davis, Chair, House Committee on Economic & Small Business Development
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE:
HB3182 by Harper-Brown (Relating to changing eligibility requirements, limiting disbursements for eligible expenses and changing reporting requirements under the major events trust fund and events trust fund.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend eligibility, disbursement, and reporting requirements related to the Major Events Trust Fund (METF) and the Events Trust Fund (ETF). The bill would require that an event funded through METF have an incremental increase in state and local revenues of at least $1 million. The bill would reduce the length of time the Comptroller of Public Accounts (Comptroller) has to complete a post-event impact study for a METF event from 18 to 10 months and would prohibit consideration of the same event in the same municipality or county until the study is completed. The bill would repeal provisions related to the METF which provide authority to fund an eligible event ahead of the event through appropriations made for that purpose.
The bill would limit the number of requests an endorsing municipality or county may submit for event funding through the ETF to once per calendar year with the exception of events which would generate at least $375,000 in incremental tax revenue or which would draw at least 25,000 out of state visitors. The Comptroller would be authorized to proportionately reduce the amount an endorsing municipality or county is eligible to receive from the ETF if an event's actual attendance figures are significantly less than the projected attendance count.
The bill would limit disbursements from both the METF and ETF to expenses deemed necessary to conduct the event and would create a five percent cap for disbursements related to an expense for a structural improvement or addition of a fixture to a site if the improvement or addition is expected to derive most of its value in subsequent uses.
Based on the analysis of the Comptroller, it is anticipated that any additional costs to implement the provisions of the bill could be absorbed within existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.