TO: | Honorable Harvey Hilderbran, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means |
FROM: | Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board |
IN RE: | HJR72 by King, Phil (Proposing a constitutional amendment to allow the surviving spouse of a person who is disabled to receive a limitation on school district ad valorem taxes on the person's residence homestead if the spouse is 55 years of age or older at the time of the person's death.), As Introduced |
Fiscal Year | Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact to General Revenue Related Funds |
---|---|
2014 | ($108,921) |
2015 | ($74,000) |
2016 | ($237,000) |
2017 | ($406,000) |
2018 | ($585,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Savings/(Cost) from General Revenue Fund 1 |
Probable Savings/(Cost) from Foundation School Fund 193 |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from School Districts |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Counties |
---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | ($108,921) | $0 | $0 | $0 |
2015 | $0 | ($74,000) | ($115,000) | ($58,000) |
2016 | $0 | ($237,000) | ($149,000) | ($117,000) |
2017 | $0 | ($406,000) | ($186,000) | ($179,000) |
2018 | $0 | ($585,000) | ($226,000) | ($245,000) |
Fiscal Year | Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Cities |
Probable Revenue Gain/(Loss) from Other Special Districts |
---|---|---|
2014 | $0 | $0 |
2015 | ($64,000) | ($42,000) |
2016 | ($130,000) | ($86,000) |
2017 | ($199,000) | ($131,000) |
2018 | ($272,000) | ($178,000) |
This resolution is self enabling. The resolution's provision that would transfer the tax ceiling of a disabled homestead owner to a surviving spouse would create a fiscal impact to local taxing units and to the state through the operation of the school funding formula. The number of surviving spouses between the ages of 55 and 65, and the value loss attributable to the transferred tax ceilings proposed by the bill were estimated based on mortality tables from the U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Census Bureau population data, and information from appraisal districts. Surviving spouses who are at least 65 years of age would get the tax ceiling under current law. Each year's value loss was added to the losses in previous years and offset by the lapse of exemptions caused by deaths and relocations of surviving spouses.
The applicable projected tax rates were applied to estimate the levy loss to special districts, cities and counties, and to estimate the initial school district loss. Because of the operation of the hold harmless provisions of the Education Code, about 60% of the school district cost related to the compressed rate would be transferred to the state in the first year of a taxable property value loss and 100% in later years. Because lagged year property values are used in the enrichment formula, school districts lose enrichment funding (state savings) in the first year of a taxable property value reduction. In the second and successive years the enrichment cost and a portion of the school district debt (facilities) cost are transferred to the state through the relevant funding formulas. All costs were estimated over the five year projection period.
The cost to the state for publication of the resolution is $108,921.
Source Agencies: | 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
|
LBB Staff: | UP, KK, SD, SJS
|