LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
 
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT STATEMENT
 
83RD LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
 
April 16, 2013

TO:
Honorable Abel Herrero, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
 
FROM:
Ursula Parks, Director, Legislative Budget Board
 
IN RE:
HB2736 by White (Relating to the placement on community supervision of certain defendants convicted of a state jail felony.), As Introduced

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to the placement on community supervision of certain defendants convicted of a state jail felony. Except in cases when the defendant was previously placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense, the bill's provisions would require defendants incarcerated for state jail offenses other than certain drug offenses to be released to community supervision after serving half their sentence, including time credits earned through the diligent participation program. The term of community supervision could last no longer than two years. Once placed on community supervision, the judge must retract any time credits earned through the diligent participation program and require the defendant to be reincarcerated for the remainder of the original sentence if the defendant violates a single condition of community supervision. The bill would take effect immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all members elected to each house and would only apply to offenses committed on or after that date. Otherwise, the bill would take effect on September 1, 2013, and only apply to offenses committed on or after that date.
 
A state jail felony is punishable by confinement in a state jail for a term from 180 days to 2 years and, in addition to confinement, an optional fine not to exceed $10,000 or Class A Misdemeanor punishment (mandatory post conviction community supervision).
 
The bill replaces a period of incarceration with a period of community supervision. Shifting offenders from incarceration to supervision is expected to decrease demands upon state and/or county correctional resources since supervision is less costly than incarceration. The bill may have a positive fiscal impact by decreasing the number of people incarcerated within state correctional institutions for state jail felonies. Whether the bill would result in a significant amount of savings to the state is indeterminate due to a lack of statewide data on the number of offenders on community supervision who commit one or more violations and, of those offenders who commit a violation, the length of time until offenders commit their first violation. If a sufficient number of offenders are revoked, the bill's positive fiscal impact could be reduced or negated.


Source Agencies:
LBB Staff:
UP, GG, JGA