BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 121 |
By: Fletcher |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties report that the amount of uncollected payments related to capias pro fines is too high, and the parties assert that an alternative mechanism for collecting such payments will result in more revenue for counties and municipalities. In addition, the parties contend that the option of making such a payment at the time of arrest could avoid contributing to already crowded jails, save time for arresting officers, and relieve minor offenders suddenly informed of an uncollected payment when pulled over for a routine moving violation from the burden of dealing with an impounded vehicle and the potential inconvenience of finding someone to supervise a child because of an unexpected arrest. C.S.H.B. 121 seeks to address these issues.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 121 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court to adopt an alternative procedure for collecting a defendant's past due payment on a judgment for a fine and related court costs if a capias pro fine has been issued in the case. The bill requires, under the alternative procedure, a peace officer who executes a capias pro fine or who is authorized to arrest a defendant on other grounds and who knows that the defendant owes such a past due payment to inform the defendant of the possibility of making an immediate payment of the fine and related court costs by use of a credit or debit card and of the defendant's available alternatives to making an immediate payment. The bill authorizes the peace officer, on behalf of the court, to accept the defendant's immediate payment of the fine and related court costs by use of a credit or debit card, after which the peace officer is authorized to release the defendant as appropriate based on the officer's authority for the arrest. The bill authorizes a peace officer accepting such an immediate payment to also accept payment for fees for the issuance and execution of the capias pro fine.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 121 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|