BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 338 |
By: González, Mary |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Current law requires the board of trustees of a school district that employs an internal auditor to select the internal auditor and requires the internal auditor to report directly to the board. According to interested parties, the law does not specify who is responsible for the evaluation of the internal auditor. C.S.H.B. 338 seeks to provide for that responsibility in order to shield the internal auditor from any undue influence, provide clarity for the internal auditor, school board, and superintendent, and improve efficiency within each district.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 338 amends the Education Code to make a school district board of trustees or the board's designee responsible for the evaluation of an internal auditor employed by the district. The bill requires each trustee and any designee responsible for the evaluation of the internal auditor to receive at least two hours of training at least once every two years regarding the adoption of an audit plan and the evaluation of an internal auditor.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 338 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|