System updates will be applied on February 19, 2026 at 6:00 PM. These updates will include changes to the user interface. Work is expected to take approximately 30 minutes to complete, during which the site will be unavailable.

BILL ANALYSIS

 

 

 

H.B. 518

By: Moody

Criminal Jurisprudence

Committee Report (Unamended)

 

 

 

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

 

Criminal justice professionals state that they frequently are faced with a situation in which a defendant under community supervision is alleged to have violated a condition of the community supervision and is incarcerated. When such a situation occurs, the imprisoned defendant currently is required to be brought before a court of record in order to waive the right to a hearing on the revocation of community supervision. Critics of this requirement point out the high cost of transportation and court administration in facilitating these in-court waivers. Similarly, parties sensitive to issues facing the incarcerated have suggested that often, a prisoner would prefer to avoid the disruption caused by such a proceeding.

 

H.B. 518 seeks to provide an alternative to the court appearance requirement.

 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.

 

RULEMAKING AUTHORITY

 

It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.

 

ANALYSIS

 

H.B. 518 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a judge to revoke the community supervision of a defendant imprisoned for allegedly violating a condition of the supervision without a hearing if the defendant, in addition to other actions, waives in writing the defendant's right to a hearing and to counsel before a notary public in the jurisdiction where imprisoned as an alternative to requiring such a defendant to waive those rights in writing before a court of record in that jurisdiction.

 

EFFECTIVE DATE

 

September 1, 2015.