BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 538 |
By: Spitzer |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that the territorial limits of a rural city located on a county line have long been established through the annexation of property, which has created areas in which half of a roadway is located in the city and the other half is located in the county. Critics assert that this creates an impossible situation for police and courts in determining the exact location of the occurrence of an incident for jurisdiction purposes. C.S.H.B. 538 seeks to remedy this situation.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 538 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to specify that the territorial limits of a municipality with a population of less than 2,000 that is located in two counties include the entire width of a segment of highway or street that is partially located in the municipality or a segment of highway or street that abuts property located in the municipality for purposes of municipal court concurrent jurisdiction with the justice court of a precinct in which the municipality is located in all criminal cases arising under state law that arise within the territorial limits of the municipality and are punishable by fine only. The bill includes in the jurisdiction of a peace officer employed by such a municipality the area included in the municipality's territorial limits under the bill's provisions for purposes of authorizing a peace officer to arrest without warrant a person who commits any offense within the officer's presence or view outside of the officer's jurisdiction or to arrest a person for violation of statutory provisions regarding rules of the road if the offense is committed in the county or counties in which the municipality employing the officer is located. The bill includes the area described by the bill's provisions in a municipality's territorial limits for purposes of requiring that a complaint filed in municipal court in a municipality with a population of less than 2,000 that is located in two counties allege that the offense was committed in the municipality's territorial limits.
C.S.H.B. 538 amends the Government Code to specify that the territorial limits of a municipality with a population of less than 2,000 that is located in two counties include the entire width of a segment of highway or street that is partially located in the municipality or a segment of highway or street that abuts property located in the municipality for purposes of municipal court concurrent jurisdiction with the justice court of a precinct in which the municipality is located in all criminal cases arising under state law that arise within the territorial limits of the municipality and are punishable by fine only or that arise under statutory provisions regarding alcohol-related offenses involving a minor and do not include confinement as an authorized sanction.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 538 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|