BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 590 |
By: Elkins |
Government Transparency & Operation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties assert that the development and commercialization of technology by institutions of higher education are critical components of the educational and research missions of those institutions, including those that are members of certain medical centers, and key contributors to the economic development and well-being of the state. The parties point out a gap in funding between the development of technology and actual commercialization of the technology and believe that Texas has fallen in rank with respect to funding for start-ups, resulting in the relocation of many start-ups to other states. The parties assert that the state could cultivate more start-ups by providing certain incentives. C.S.H.B. 590 seeks to create university research technology corporations to provide incentives for the development and commercialization of technologies developed by institutions of higher education and certain medical centers.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the comptroller of public accounts in SECTIONS 1 and 5 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 590 amends the Education Code to authorize any person having the capacity to be an organizer of a corporation, as provided by the Business Organizations Code, to create a special-purpose university research technology corporation for the exclusive purpose of developing and commercializing one or more technologies owned wholly or partly by a public, private, or independent institution of higher education or by a qualified medical center. The bill requires the organizer of a university research technology corporation, in order to create the corporation, to present to the secretary of state written evidence that the organizer has a license to develop and commercialize a specific technology owned wholly or partly by an institution of higher education or qualified medical center, as applicable. The bill authorizes the license to be conditioned on the creation of the corporation. The bill defines "qualified medical center," with respect to an institution of higher education, as a medical center development corporation that includes among its member institutions, as described in the corporation's books and records, one or more institutions of higher education, regardless of whether those institutions of higher education have membership status in the qualified medical center for purposes of the Business Organizations Code. The bill clarifies that a qualified medical center that owns wholly or partly the technology for which a corporation is created is governed by the same provisions of the bill that are applicable to an institution of higher education.
C.S.H.B. 590 establishes that a university research technology corporation that engages in other purposes that are not incidental to the authorized purposes is not entitled to the benefits provided by the bill's provisions, including any authorized tax exemptions. The bill requires the certificate of formation of a university research technology corporation to state that the corporation is governed by the bill's provisions, to state the name and purposes of the corporation, and to state other information as required by law and requires the organizers of the corporation to register the corporation with the comptroller of public accounts. The bill provides for the corporation's governance under specified provisions of the Business Organizations Code.
C.S.H.B. 590 requires the organizers of a university research technology corporation to name the persons constituting the initial board of directors of the corporation and requires directors other than the initial directors to be determined according to statutory provisions governing for-profit corporations. The bill requires an institution of higher education that owns wholly or partly the technology for which a corporation is created to be a shareholder in the corporation at all times and to be issued shares in the corporation when the corporation is created as agreed on by the organizers of the corporation according to any contribution of the institution. The bill authorizes the institution to be issued shares in the corporation in exchange for the contribution of rights in the technology of the institution or of other contractual obligations, as agreed on by the corporation's board of directors. The bill authorizes the institution to license any technology owned by the institution to the corporation. The bill requires the principal offices of a university research technology corporation to be located in Texas and requires more than 50 percent of any goods produced or services performed by the corporation to be produced or performed in Texas.
C.S.H.B. 590 limits the duration of a university research technology corporation to 15 years and authorizes such a corporation, at the expiration of that period, to file a restated and amended certificate of formation under which the corporation continues in existence as a for-profit corporation. The bill specifies that a corporation that files a restated and amended certificate of formation is not governed by the bill's provisions except that the corporation must comply with applicable provisions to obtain a tax exemption under the bill's provisions and is subject to the penalty established by the bill for noncompliance with corporate operations requirements. The bill establishes that the 15-year limit on the duration of such a corporation does not limit the time or manner in which the corporation may be terminated as otherwise provided by law.
C.S.H.B. 590 entitles a university research technology corporation, including a corporation that files a restated and amended certificate of formation, to certain exemptions from property taxation, the sales and use tax, and the franchise tax, as provided by the bill's amendments to the Tax Code, if the corporation is engaged exclusively in developing and commercializing one or more technologies owned wholly or partly by an institution of higher education or by a qualified medical center and the corporation complies with the requirements for operation in Texas. The bill specifies that the tax-exempt status of a university research technology corporation does not limit the corporation's eligibility for any other available tax benefit. The bill requires a university research technology corporation to maintain a complete record of all taxes for which the corporation would have been liable if the corporation had not been entitled to the tax exemptions authorized by the bill's provisions and to report that information annually to the comptroller in the form and manner required by the comptroller. The bill requires the comptroller to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of these provisions relating to the tax-exempt status of a university research technology corporation and for the administration of the sales and use tax exemption and franchise tax exemption.
C.S.H.B. 590 makes a university research technology corporation that ceases to comply with the bill's requirements to hold principal offices in Texas and produce and perform more than 50 percent of the corporation's goods and services, respectively, in Texas liable to the state for a penalty in an amount equal to any taxes for which the corporation received a tax exemption under the bill's provisions for the four calendar years preceding the year in which the noncompliance began. The bill requires the comptroller to determine the corporation's liability for the penalty and to assess the amount owed. The bill makes the penalty due on the date designated by the comptroller, not later than the 90th day after the date assessed, and requires the penalty to be collected in the same manner as a state tax. The bill establishes that a lien exists on any property of the corporation to secure the payment of any amount assessed for a penalty and entitles the comptroller to collect interest and penalties on the unpaid amount of a delinquent penalty in the same manner as a delinquent state tax. The bill requires the comptroller by rule to establish the methods of payment and to adopt other rules necessary to administer and enforce the penalty. The bill requires the amounts received in connection with the penalty to be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the general revenue fund. The bill's provisions amending the Education Code control to the extent of any conflict between those provisions and a provision of the Business Organizations Code.
C.S.H.B. 590 amends the Tax Code to entitle an eligible university research technology corporation to an exemption from property taxation of the real and tangible personal property owned by the corporation that is used in developing and commercializing one or more technologies owned wholly or partly by an institution of higher education or by a qualified medical center and the real property owned by the corporation that consists of an incomplete improvement that is under active construction or other physical preparation to make the property suitable for such use and the land on which the incomplete improvement is located that will be reasonably necessary for the corporation's use of the improvement.
C.S.H.B. 590 establishes that a university research technology corporation is not entitled to an exemption from taxation of real or tangible personal property that is owned by an organizer or director of the corporation before the creation of the corporation and that is subject to taxation in Texas before being devoted exclusively to developing and commercializing one or more technologies owned wholly or partly by an institution of higher education or by a qualified medical center. The bill entitles a qualified university research technology corporation to an exemption from taxation of the value of that portion of an improvement that consists of an expansion of an improvement not eligible for an exemption if the improvement is devoted exclusively to the applicable development and commercialization purpose. The bill entitles a medical center development corporation to an exemption from taxation of the corporation's real and tangible personal property that is leased to or used or occupied primarily by a qualified university research technology corporation and used exclusively for the applicable development and commercialization purposes and entitles a qualified university research technology corporation to an exemption from taxation of a possessory interest in such property.
C.S.H.B. 590 exempts a taxable item sold, leased, or rented to, or stored, used, or consumed by, an eligible university research technology corporation from the sales and use tax if the item is classified by the corporation as a capital asset. The bill establishes that an item is considered to be classified by the corporation as a capital asset if the item is considered to be a capital asset according to generally accepted accounting principles adopted by the Financial Accounting Standards Board and is recognized by the corporation as a capital asset on the corporation's federal income tax returns. The bill requires the comptroller to adopt rules necessary to implement this exemption.
C.S.H.B. 590 exempts an eligible university technology research corporation from the franchise tax.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2016, except that the bill's provisions relating to the exemption from property taxation for a university research technology corporation take effect January 1, 2016, only if the constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for an exemption from property taxation of certain property owned by or leased to or by a university research technology corporation is approved by the voters.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 590 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|