BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 725 |
By: Turner, Sylvester |
Juvenile Justice & Family Issues |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Currently, a juvenile who is certified to stand trial as an adult cannot appeal that certification until after conviction or after an order of deferred adjudication has been entered, a process which can take years. Interested parties contend that allowing an appeal at an earlier point could save the state valuable resources if it is determined that a certification was improper prior to the adult trial. C.S.H.B. 725 seeks to bring fairness, equity, and efficiency to this appeals process.
|
||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Supreme Court of Texas in SECTION 3 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 725 amends the Family Code to include an appeal of a juvenile court order that waives the juvenile court's exclusive original jurisdiction and that transfers a child to criminal court for prosecution among the appeals that have precedence over all other cases. The bill requires the Supreme Court of Texas to adopt rules ensuring the acceleration of the disposition by the appellate court and the supreme court of such an appeal and includes such an appeal among the appeals that may be taken by or on behalf of a child.
C.S.H.B. 725 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to make a conforming change.
C.S.H.B. 725 repeals Article 44.47, Code of Criminal Procedure, authorizing a defendant to appeal an order of a juvenile court certifying the defendant to stand trial as an adult and transferring the defendant from a juvenile court to a criminal court.
|
||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 725 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|