BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 743 |
By: Huberty |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that, among other issues with statewide standardized tests, the length of the tests can be overly burdensome on students and that a student should be given the opportunity to finish a test without facing pressure from the student's peers who have already completed the test. C.S.H.B. 743 seeks to address issues relating to statewide standardized tests.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Texas Education Agency in SECTION 3 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 743 amends the Education Code to require a statewide standardized test, before the test may be administered, to be determined valid and reliable based on empirical evidence by an entity that is independent of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and of any other entity that developed the test. The bill requires TEA to ensure that such a test is designed to primarily assess the essential knowledge and skills identified by the State Board of Education (SBOE) of the subject and for the grade level for which the test is administered. The bill authorizes the test, only to the extent necessary or helpful for diagnostic or reporting purposes, to assess supporting knowledge or skills that are introduced or referenced in the subject and for the grade level for which the test is administered but that are identified as essential knowledge or skills primarily of a different subject or for a different grade level. The bill prohibits inclusion of student performance as to such supporting knowledge or skills among the test results used as student achievement indicators. The bill requires the test to be designed so that if administered to students in grades three through five, 85 percent will be able to complete the test within 120 minutes and if administered to students in grades six through eight, 85 percent will be able to complete the test within 180 minutes. The bill limits to eight hours the amount of time allowed for administration of the test and authorizes the administration of the test to occur on only one day.
C.S.H.B. 743 requires TEA to conduct a study regarding the essential knowledge and skills of the required curriculum identified by the SBOE and statewide standardized tests and end-of-course tests. The bill sets out the issues required to be evaluated in the study. The bill requires TEA, not later than March 1, 2016, to prepare and submit a report to the SBOE concerning the results of this study. The bill requires the SBOE, not later than May 1, 2016, to review the study and submit TEA's report and SBOE recommendations regarding each issue evaluated to the governor and each member of the legislature. These provisions expire June 1, 2017.
C.S.H.B. 743 requires TEA by rule to develop a comprehensive methodology for auditing and monitoring performance under contracts for services to develop or administer statewide standardized tests and end-of-course tests to verify compliance with contractual obligations. The bill requires TEA to ensure that all such new and renewed contracts include a provision that TEA or a TEA designee may conduct periodic contract compliance reviews to monitor vendor performance without advance notice. The bill requires TEA to adopt rules to administer these requirements.
C.S.H.B. 743 applies beginning with the 2015–2016 school year.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 743 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|