BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 833 |
By: Clardy |
Licensing & Administrative Procedures |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties are concerned a provision of state law affects the ability of certain holders of motor home manufacturer's and dealer's licenses to continue their operations. The parties illustrate their concerns with the experience of one Texas-based manufacturer and retailer of motor homes, which closed one of its two dealerships due to poor economic conditions in the last few years. The parties explain that with improving economic conditions the manufacturer is seeking to reopen a second dealership but is having difficulty because the second dealership license is void based on the interpretation of current law. C.S.H.B. 833 seeks to amend the applicable law to address this issue.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 833 amends the Occupations Code to authorize a person who on June 7, 1995, held both a motor home manufacturer's license and a motor home dealer's license, for purposes of the authority to operate as both a manufacturer and dealer of motor homes but of no other type of vehicle, to hold a motor home manufacturer's license, a dealer general distinguishing number issued by the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles, and not more than two franchised dealer's licenses. |
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 833 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|