BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1334 |
By: Clardy |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Currently, a tenant is authorized to appeal a judgment in an eviction case by filing a bond, making a cash deposit, or filing a statement of inability to pay with the justice court. However, interested parties contend that there is no process to verify whether an appeal bond is valid nor any requirement that a tenant who files an appeal bond pay money into the court registry to cover the cost of rent while the appeal is pending, which the parties claim can take up to three months. The parties express concern that this lack of a verification process and deposit requirement leads to an abuse of appeal bonds by tenants attempting to delay legitimate evictions. C.S.H.B. 1334 seeks to provide a process for ensuring the validity and financial integrity of appeal bonds filed in eviction cases.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1334 amends the Property Code to require a justice court in a residential eviction suit for nonpayment of rent to state in the court's judgment the amount of the appeal bond, taking into consideration the money required to be paid into the court registry under statutory provisions governing the payment of rent during the appeal of an eviction. The bill requires the bond, in addition to meeting all other requirements of law, to require the surety to provide the surety's contact information and, if any of the surety's contact information changes, requires the surety to inform the court of the surety's new contact information.
C.S.H.B. 1334, if a party appeals the judgment of a justice court in a residential eviction suit for nonpayment of rent by filing an appeal bond, authorizes the opposing party to contest the bond amount, the form of the bond, or the financial ability of a surety to pay the bond by filing written notice with the justice court contesting the appeal bond on or before the fifth day after the date the appeal bond is filed and by serving a copy on the other party. The bill requires the justice court, after the notice is filed, to notify the other party and the surety of the contest. The bill requires the justice court, not later than the fifth day after the date the contest is filed, to hold a hearing to hear evidence to determine whether to approve or disapprove the amount or form of the bond or the surety. The bill establishes that, if a party contests the amount or form of the bond, the contesting party has the burden to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the amount or form of the bond, as applicable, is insufficient.
C.S.H.B. 1334 requires the party filing the bond, if a party contests the financial ability of a surety to pay the bond, to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the surety has sufficient nonexempt assets to pay the appeal bond. The bill requires the justice court to disapprove a bond if the justice court determines that the amount or form of the bond is insufficient or that the surety does not have sufficient nonexempt assets to pay the appeal bond. The bill makes the failure of the surety to appear at the contest hearing prima facie evidence that the bond should be disapproved. The bill authorizes the appealing party, not later than the fifth day after the date the justice court disapproves an appeal bond, to make a cash deposit, to file a sworn statement of inability to pay with the justice court, or to appeal the decision disapproving the appeal bond to the county court. The bill, if the appealing party fails to take such an authorized action, makes the judgment of the justice court final and requires a writ of possession and other processes to enforce the judgment to be issued on the payment of the required fee.
C.S.H.B. 1334 requires the justice court, if an appeal is filed, to transmit to the county court the contest to the appeal bond and all relevant documents. The bill requires the county court to docket the appeal, to schedule a hearing to be held not later than the fifth day after the date the appeal is docketed, to notify the parties and the surety of the hearing time and date, and to hear the contest de novo. The bill establishes that the failure of the county court to hold a timely hearing is not grounds for approval or denial of the appeal and prohibits the issuance of a writ of possession before the county court issues a final decision on the appeal bond. The bill requires the county clerk, after the contest is heard by the county court, to transmit the transcript and the records of the case to the justice court. The bill authorizes a party, if the county court disapproves the appeal bond and not later than the fifth day after the date of such disapproval, to perfect the appeal of the judgment on the eviction suit by making a cash deposit in the justice court in an amount determined by the county court or by filing a sworn statement of inability to pay with the justice court pursuant to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
C.S.H.B. 1334, if the tenant is the appealing party and a cash deposit in the required amount is not timely made or a sworn statement of inability to pay is not timely filed, makes the judgment of the justice court final and requires a writ of possession and other processes to enforce the judgment to be issued on the payment of the required fee. The bill, if the landlord is the appealing party and a cash deposit is not timely made or a sworn statement of inability to pay is not timely filed, makes the judgment of the justice court final. The bill requires the county court, if the appeal bond is approved by the court, to transmit the transcript and other records of the case to the justice court, and requires the justice court to proceed as if the appeal bond was originally approved.
C.S.H.B. 1334 establishes that a contest under the bill's provisions does not preclude a party from contesting the appeal bond in the county court after the county court has jurisdiction over the eviction suit. The bill authorizes the county court, after the county court has such jurisdiction, to modify the amount or form of the bond and to determine the sufficiency of the surety.
C.S.H.B. 1334 requires a tenant who files an appeal bond to appeal an eviction for nonpayment of rent and not later than the fifth day after the date the tenant filed the appeal bond to pay into the justice court registry the amount of rent to be paid in one rental pay period as determined by the court. The bill authorizes the plaintiff to request a writ of possession if the tenant fails to timely pay that amount into the justice court registry and the transcript has not yet been transmitted to the county court. The bill requires the justice court, on request and payment of the applicable fee, to issue the writ of possession immediately and without a hearing. The bill requires the justice court, regardless of whether a writ of possession is issued, to transmit the transcript and appeal documents to the county court for trial de novo on issues relating to possession, rent, or attorney's fees. The bill authorizes the plaintiff in the eviction suit, on sworn motion and hearing, to withdraw money deposited in the court registry before the final determination in the case, the dismissal of the appeal, or the order of the court after final hearing. The bill requires the county court to give precedence to such a hearing or motion.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
January 1, 2016.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1334 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|