BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1403 |
By: Sheets |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties report that a recent Texas court case held that a health care liability claim could include an employee's claim against an employer for a workplace injury, but the claimant's case was dismissed for the claimant's failure to provide an expert report in a health care liability claim. Some parties contend that the state Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act did not intend to classify a claim by an employee against an employer as a health care liability claim. C.S.H.B. 1403 seeks to clarify this issue.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1403 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to specify that the term "health care liability claim," as defined in statutory provisions governing medical liability, does not include certain causes of action under the Texas Workers' Compensation Act against an employer by an employee or the employee's surviving spouse or heir to recover damages for personal injuries or death sustained by an employee in the course and scope of the employment or to recover exemplary damages for death caused by an intentional act or omission of the employer or by the employer's gross negligence.
C.S.H.B. 1403 requires an expert report served by a claimant in a health care liability claim on each defendant or the defendant's attorney to address at least one theory of direct liability asserted against each physician or health care provider against whom a theory of direct liability is asserted.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1403 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|