BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1422 |
By: Lozano |
Land & Resource Management |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that many entities, including certain rural rail transportation districts, have lost the power of eminent domain due to a failure to comply with the deadlines for submission of a claim to eminent domain authority to the comptroller of public accounts. These parties also note that certain rural rail transportation districts need this authority to build new rail lines to keep up with significant economic development and industrial growth in the respective areas. C.S.H.B. 1422 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1422 amends the Transportation Code to authorize a rural rail transportation district that is located in a county adjacent to a county in which there is located a port authority that has the authority to issue a permit for the movement of oversize or overweight vehicles under statutory provisions relating to Port of Corpus Christi Authority roadway permits or special freight corridor permits to exercise the power of eminent domain on and after September 1, 2015, if the district's authority to exercise that power expired on September 1, 2013, because the district failed to submit a letter to the comptroller of public accounts stating the district's authorization by the state to exercise that power and identifying each provision of law that grants the district that authority.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015, unless the bill does not receive the necessary vote.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1422 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|