BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1588 |
By: Villalba |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties are concerned that timeshare property owners are selling timeshare interests to several individuals with overlapping interest periods. C.S.H.B. 1588 seeks to provide an administrative remedy to resolve clouded title in timeshare interests and allow individuals to fully enjoy the property interest they purchase.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1588 amends the Property Code to authorize the owner of an applicable condominium unit, if a deed or other instrument has been recorded in the real property records asserting or purporting to convey a timeshare interest in the condominium unit, to bring an action in a district court in the county in which the condominium unit is located seeking a determination that the timeshare interest is invalid or void. The bill's provisions apply only to a condominium unit that is located on a barrier island that borders the Gulf of Mexico, is subject to a declaration creating a condominium regime to which the Condominium Act applies and a timeshare plan applicable to all or part of the condominium property, and that is located in a development in which the timeshare association has not paid any fees, dues, assessments, or other charges due to the condominium council of owners for a period of at least three years immediately preceding the filing of an action under the bill's provisions.
C.S.H.B. 1588 authorizes citation in the action to be served by publication in a newspaper in the county in which the condominium unit is located if the whereabouts or identity of the person asserting the timeshare interest or to whom the timeshare interest is purported to have been conveyed is unknown to the person bringing the action and prescribes the required contents of the published citation. The bill establishes that service by publication in the action is governed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure except to the extent of any conflict with these bill provisions.
C.S.H.B. 1588 makes a timeshare interest in a condominium unit void if the person bringing an action establishes that the following circumstances exist: · the person bringing the action holds record title to the condominium unit; · on the date the instrument asserting the timeshare interest or purporting to convey the timeshare interest was filed for recording, the person bringing the action held record title to the condominium unit or record title to the condominium unit was held by a person other than the declarant who precedes the person bringing the action in the chain of title to the unit; · the timeshare interest was not conveyed by the person bringing the action or any other person who follows the declarant in the chain of title to the unit; · the person asserting the timeshare interest or to whom the timeshare interest is purported to have been conveyed has not paid any required assessments in connection with the timeshare interest for a period of at least three years immediately preceding the filing of the action; and · at no time on or after the date the instrument was filed for recording has a person made an attempt to exercise the right to occupy the unit under the timeshare interest. The bill establishes that the voiding of a timeshare interest under those circumstances does not preclude a determination that a timeshare interest is invalid or void under any other law.
C.S.H.B. 1588 authorizes the court in an action under the bill's provisions to enter a default judgment declaring that a timeshare interest is invalid or void if the person asserting the timeshare interest or to whom the timeshare interest was purported to have been conveyed was personally served with citation or was cited by publication and fails to timely appear and answer. The bill, notwithstanding Rule 329, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, or any other law, and regardless of the manner of citation or whether the judgment is a default judgment or a judgment on the merits, requires a motion for a new trial in an action to be filed on or before the 30th day after the date the judgment is signed and makes the judgment final and unappealable on the 31st day after the date the judgment is signed.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1588 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|