BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1595 |
By: Murr |
Corrections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that current law requires a detainee to be tested for infectious diseases if the detainee's bodily fluids come into contact with a peace officer, provided the contact was instigated by the detainee, and requires that notification of the test results be provided to the peace officer. However, these parties believe that current law does not adequately provide the same protection for magistrates or correctional facility employees. C.S.H.B. 1595 seeks to remedy this situation.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1595 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to include a person arrested for a misdemeanor or felony who causes the person's bodily fluids to come into contact with certain individuals during a judicial proceeding or initial period of confinement following the arrest or during the person's confinement after conviction or adjudication resulting from the arrest among the defendants or confined persons required to undergo testing for communicable diseases at the direction of a court with jurisdiction over the person. The bill includes a magistrate or a correctional facility employee among the persons whose contact with a defendant or confined person's bodily fluids triggers the requirement for the defendant or confined person to undergo testing for a communicable disease, on whose request a court may direct the defendant or confined person to undergo testing, and who must be notified regarding the test results.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1595 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|