BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1681 |
By: Bohac |
County Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Reports indicate that seemingly suspicious transactions are sometimes conducted in the lobbies of county clerk offices and that fraudulent documents are sometimes later found to have been filed. Observers assert that requiring a person filing a document with a county clerk to provide identification and to include identifying information along with the filed document would help deter fraudulent filings. C.S.H.B. 1681 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1681 amends the Local Government Code to authorize a county clerk to require a person presenting a document in person for filing in the real property records of the county to present to the clerk a photo identification verifying the person's identity. The bill authorizes the clerk to determine the forms of photo identification that may be presented to verify the person's identity. The bill authorizes the clerk to copy the photo identification or record information from the photo identification. The bill prohibits the clerk from charging a person a fee to copy or record the information from a photo identification. The bill makes information copied or recorded from the photo identification confidential and establishes that a document filed with a county clerk is not invalid solely because the clerk did not copy a photo identification or record the information from the photo identification.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1681 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|