BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1743 |
By: Galindo |
Government Transparency & Operation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that state
agencies spend approximately $150 million annually and earn nearly $3 million
in rebates through the State of Texas charge card program. These parties assert
that some agencies could better utilize this program for appropriate
purchasing and travel expenses because a significant amount of these
purchases and expenses are currently being put on employee credit cards. It
has been suggested that requiring more of these purchases and expenses to be
paid with a state card could result in increased revenue due to a higher program
rebate, reduced agency costs, and more transparency in the reporting of
employee expenditures.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission in SECTION 2 of this bill.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1743 amends the Government Code to require the rules adopted by the comptroller of public accounts relating to the use of credit or charge cards by state agencies to pay for purchases to require a state agency in the executive branch of state government to use a credit or charge card to pay for all purchases, unless the comptroller determines that another method of payment is more advantageous to the state, and to prohibit an employee of a state agency in the executive branch of state government from using a personal credit or charge card to pay for the state agency's purchases.
C.S.H.B. 1743 requires the rules adopted by the comptroller for the effective and efficient administration of the Travel Regulations Act and the travel provisions of the General Appropriations Act to require a state agency in the executive branch of state government that participates in a program administered by the comptroller that allows the agency to use a credit or charge card to pay for travel expenses to use the credit or charge card to pay for travel expenses required for agency travel, unless the comptroller determines that another method of payment is more advantageous to the state, and to prohibit an employee of such an agency from using the employee's personal credit or charge card to pay for travel expenses required for agency travel.
C.S.H.B. 1743 requires a state agency in the executive branch of state government that participates in a program administered by the comptroller that allows the agency to use a credit or charge card to purchase travel services to use the credit or charge card to purchase travel services required for agency travel, unless the comptroller determines that another method of purchase is more advantageous to the state, and prohibits an employee of such an agency from using the employee's personal credit or charge card to purchase travel services required for agency travel.
C.S.H.B. 1743 exempts an institution of higher education, the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC), the health and human services agencies, and the office of the governor from the bill's provisions relating to the use of a credit or charge card by executive branch state agencies in general. The bill requires the executive commissioner of HHSC by rule to develop a policy that encourages participation in a program administered by the comptroller relating to the use of a credit or charge card to pay for travel expenses and requires HHSC and each health and human services agency to implement that policy.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1743 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|