BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1764 |
By: Hunter |
Government Transparency & Operation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties point out that when a string of government officials began conducting official business through private e-mail accounts in an attempt to circumvent the public information laws, the legislature codified the substance of an attorney general opinion that held it is the content, not the communication device, that determines whether a communication is subject to state public information law. The parties contend that the attorney general has consistently ruled that if a public official is conducting official business on a private device, such official communication is public information and that a recent court decision confirmed the status of such communications.
These interested parties have expressed concern that some public officials have responded to the new law by claiming that the governmental agency is not the custodian of their private communication devices and cannot order them to release documents that are subject to state public information law if the documents are held on those devices. Likewise, the parties report that some governmental agencies have responded to the new law by claiming that they cannot obtain documents stored on the private computing device of a government official who is conducting business on the device because the agency does not have custody and control of the device from which the e-mails can be accessed. C.S.H.B. 1764 seeks to address this loophole, which has been identified by a Texas appeals court in a recent court case.
|
||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1764 amends the Government Code to include among the duties of a governmental body's officer for public information the requirement to make reasonable efforts to obtain public information from a temporary custodian if the information has been requested from the governmental body; the officer for public information is aware of facts sufficient to warrant a reasonable belief that the temporary custodian has possession, custody, or control of the information; the officer for public information is unable to comply with the duties imposed by state public information law without obtaining the information from the temporary custodian; and the temporary custodian has not provided the information to the officer for public information of the governmental body or the officer's agent. The bill defines "temporary custodian" as an officer or employee of a governmental body who, in the transaction of official business, creates or receives public information that the officer or employee has not provided to the officer for public information of the governmental body or the officer's agent. The bill specifies that the term includes a former officer or employee of a governmental body who created or received public information in the officer's or employee's official capacity that has not been provided to the officer for public information of the governmental body or the officer's agent.
C.S.H.B. 1764 establishes that a current or former officer or employee of a governmental body does not have, by virtue of the officer's or employee's position or former position, a personal or property right to public information the officer or employee created or received while acting in an official capacity. The bill requires a temporary custodian with possession, custody, or control of public information to surrender or return the information to the governmental body not later than the 10th day after the date the officer for public information of the governmental body or the officer's agent requests the temporary custodian to surrender or return the information. The bill requires the officer for public information of the governmental body, if a temporary custodian fails to surrender or return public information to a governmental body, to notify the attorney general in writing of the facts related to the failure and send a copy of the written notice to the requestor not later than the 10th business day after the deadline to surrender or return the information. The bill authorizes the attorney general, on receipt of written notice from an officer for public information, to sue for an injunction or writ of mandamus to compel a temporary custodian with possession, custody, or control of public information to surrender or return the information. The bill requires such a suit to be filed in a district court for the county in which the main offices of the governmental body are located and requires the attorney general to send a copy of the filed petition to the requestor. The bill prohibits such a suit from proceeding, and process from being issued, until the court enters a written finding that the petition sets forth facts sufficient to warrant probable cause that the current or former officer or employee against whom the action is filed is in possession, custody, or control of public information that has not been made available to the governmental body that owns the information. The bill requires such a suit to be dismissed with prejudice if the current or former officer or employee files an answer containing a general denial supported by a sworn affidavit stating that the officer or employee is not in possession, custody, or control of public information responsive to the request at issue. The bill establishes that a suit dismissed for this reason is dismissed without prejudice and may be refiled by the attorney general if the current or former officer or employee, in providing the affidavit, engaged in conduct constituting perjury or aggravated perjury and is arrested, charged, or indicted for that offense. The bill exempts such a refiled suit from the bill's requirement that certain suits be dismissed with prejudice.
C.S.H.B. 1764 establishes, for purposes of the application of state public information law relating to attorney general decisions to information surrendered or returned to a governmental body by a temporary custodian or as a result of a suit under the bill's provisions, the governmental body is considered to receive the request for information on the date the information is surrendered or returned to the governmental body. The bill makes it a misdemeanor punishable by a fine, confinement, or both for a temporary custodian who has possession, custody, or control of public information responsive to a request to, with criminal negligence, fail to surrender or return the information to the governmental body on request of the officer for public information or the officer's agent.
|
||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1764 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill. |
||||||||||||||||||
|