BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 1814 |
By: Farney |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that, although current law authorizes the online renewal of a Texas driver's license under certain conditions, a military service member on active duty outside of the United States may not be able to renew online if the service member has renewed online previously or has been stationed outside of the United States for longer than two years. The parties further note that these limitations present difficulty for active duty members of the military and that the same difficulty may be encountered by the family of such a service member. C.S.H.B. 1814 seeks to amend the applicable law to ensure that military personnel serving our country outside of the United States and members of their family will continue to be able to have a valid driver's license.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 1814 amends the Transportation Code to require a rule adopted by the Department of Public Safety authorizing the renewal of a driver's license by electronic means to allow for the renewal of a driver's license of a person who is on active duty in the U.S. armed forces and is absent from Texas and the spouse or dependent child of the person on active duty, regardless of when the license expires.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 1814 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|