BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2071 |
By: Workman |
Insurance |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that a recent court ruling has produced unintended consequences by disallowing the Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association to pay individuals holding a valid assignment of a covered claim. The parties note that the ruling has had a negative effect on the protection of the consumer as well as a chilling effect on the insurance premium finance industry's ability to use traditional industry practices of using the assignment of claims as collateral in the very policies they are financing. C.S.H.B. 2071 seeks to address this issue by amending the applicable law.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2071 amends the Insurance Code to establish that a person has a covered claim under the Texas Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Act if the person holds a valid assignment of a covered claim for unearned premiums.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2071 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|