BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2170 |
By: Murphy |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that the absence of enhanced penalties for certain repeat misdemeanor offenses enables some criminals to specialize in misdemeanor crimes. As a result, the parties continue, these career criminals are punished with light sentences and serve their time in county jail facilities, causing some repeat offenders to be deprived of adequate access to treatment options to address any underlying problems. The parties believe that the lack of treatment options and the light penalties imposed for these types of crimes build a pathway to a life of crime. C.S.H.B. 2170 seeks to break this cycle.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2170 amends the Penal Code to enhance from a Class A misdemeanor to a state jail felony the penalty for an offense that is otherwise a Class A misdemeanor if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has been previously convicted four or more times of a Class A misdemeanor or any degree of felony, at least one of the previous convictions was of a felony, and each of the previous offenses was committed in the 10-year period preceding the date of commission of the instant offense. The bill excludes a state jail felony resulting from such an enhancement from statutory provisions enhancing to the next higher degree of felony the penalty for certain repeat and habitual felony offenders on trial for a first, second, or third degree felony if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has previously been finally convicted of any such felony. The bill prohibits a state jail felony resulting from the enhancement of a Class A misdemeanor offense for certain repeat and habitual misdemeanor offenders from being used as the basis for certain felony enhancement purposes.
C.S.H.B. 2170 includes previous convictions for two state jail felonies resulting from the enhancement of a Class A misdemeanor offense among the state jail felony convictions used as the basis for the enhancement of certain state jail felonies to a third degree felony for certain repeat and habitual misdemeanor offenders. The bill excludes a previous conviction for a state jail felony resulting from such enhancement from the previous felony convictions that may be used as the basis for the enhancement of certain state jail felonies to a second degree felony for those offenders.
C.S.H.B. 2170 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to include a conviction of certain offenses under the Texas Controlled Substances Act punishable as a state jail felony for certain repeat and habitual offenders among the state jail felony convictions for which a judge is required or authorized, depending on a previous conviction or deferred adjudication, to suspend imposition of the defendant's sentence and order the defendant to be placed on community supervision. The bill includes a conviction of a state jail felony resulting from the enhancement of a Class A misdemeanor offense for certain repeat and habitual misdemeanor offenders among the convictions for which a judge is authorized to suspend the imposition of the defendant's sentence and place the defendant on community supervision or order the sentence to be executed in whole or in part with a term of community supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2170 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|