BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2251 |
By: Anchia |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that the current payment schedule for state education funding places a significant burden on open-enrollment charter schools. According to the parties, all open-enrollment charter schools, regardless of size or rate of growth, are issued equal payments once a month. For those schools that begin classes mid-summer, the July and August payments are calculated using the previous school year's enrollment. As a result, these schools begin the first two months of the school year with funding based on an outdated student count, which encumbers fast-growth charter schools. Conversely, the parties continue, some school districts operate on a payment schedule that provides the bulk of a school's funding early in the school year, providing much needed support for the purchases, hires, and operational costs that come with a new school year in a fast-growth district. C.S.H.B. 2251 seeks to allow a charter school with increased enrollment from the previous year to request an alternative payment schedule that frontloads the percentage of yearly entitlement payments in order to better manage growth while maintaining strict quality standards.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2251 amends the Education Code to require the commissioner of education, on the request of an open-enrollment charter school, to compare the student enrollment of the open-enrollment charter school for the current school year to the student enrollment of the school during the preceding school year. The bill authorizes the open-enrollment charter school, if the number of students enrolled at the school for the current school year has increased by 10 percent or more from the number of students enrolled during the preceding school year, to request that payments from the foundation school fund to the school for the following school year and each subsequent school year be made according to a schedule as prescribed by the bill. The bill entitles an open-enrollment charter school that qualifies to receive foundation school fund transfers as provided by the bill to receive funding in that manner for three school years. The bill requires the commissioner, on the expiration of that period, to determine the eligibility of the open-enrollment charter school to continue receiving payments from the foundation school fund for an additional three school years and requires the open-enrollment charter school to subsequently reestablish eligibility every three school years.
C.S.H.B. 2251 prescribes the payment schedule and authorizes the modification of the amount of any installment under the schedule to provide an open-enrollment charter school with the proper amount to which the school may be entitled by law and to correct errors in the allocation or distribution of funds. The bill requires previously unpaid additional funds from prior fiscal years owed to an open-enrollment charter school to be paid to the school together with the September payment of the current fiscal year entitlement. The bill limits the applicability of its provisions to a payment from the foundation school fund that is made on or after September 1, 2015. The bill requires the commissioner to determine the eligibility of an open-enrollment charter school to receive the payments for the 2015–2016 school year based on the growth in the school's enrollment between the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 school years.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2251 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|