BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2278 |
By: Muņoz, Jr. |
Juvenile Justice & Family Issues |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Many judges, interested parties note, are currently authorized to conduct a marriage ceremony, but other associate judges and retired associate judges are not. The parties note the irony of the situation in which a full-time associate judge, for example, despite having the authority to grant a divorce, is unable to conduct a marriage ceremony. C.S.H.B. 2278 seeks to promote fairness and equality among judges with regard to the authority to conduct marriage ceremonies.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2278 amends the Family Code to include an associate judge of a statutory probate court, a retired associate judge of a statutory probate court, an associate judge of a county court at law, and a retired associate judge of a county court at law among the persons authorized to conduct a marriage ceremony.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2278 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|