BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2303 |
By: Kuempel |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties point out that exemptions from liability provided to a landowner who allows recreational activities on the landowner's property are insufficient, hindering access to certain recreational activities. C.S.H.B. 2303 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2303 amends the Civil Practice and Remedies Code to include the use of a recreational off-highway vehicle among the types of pleasure driving included in the definition of "recreation" for purposes of statutory provisions regarding the liability of certain owners, lessees, or occupants of land for injuries incurred during certain recreational activities by an individual who has entered the land.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2303 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|