BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2343 |
By: Dutton |
Special Purpose Districts |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The Generation Park Management District is located in Northeast Harris County, Texas, within two emergency services districts. Interested parties recognize a need to address certain matters relating to its territory in the emergency services districts and to also clarify certain aspects of the management district's creation legislation. C.S.H.B. 2343 seeks to provide for those needs.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2343 amends the Special District Local Laws Code to establish that the Generation Park Management District is a governmental unit under the Texas Tort Claims Act and that the operations of the district are essential government functions and are not proprietary functions for any purpose, including the application of that act. The bill establishes that statutory provisions establishing and governing the district do not waive any governmental or sovereign immunity from suit, liability, or judgment applicable to the district. The bill revises the purposes of the district and establishes that the district will not act as the agent or instrumentality of any private interest even though the district will benefit many private interests as well as the public. The bill clarifies that all or any part of the district is eligible for inclusion in one or more of the following: a tax increment reinvestment zone, a tax abatement reinvestment zone, an enterprise zone, a foreign trade zone, or an industrial district.
C.S.H.B. 2343 specifies that statutory provisions establishing and governing the district prevail over certain Water Code provisions related to general law districts. The bill applies to the district Water Code provisions relating to the disqualification of a person to serve as a member of a district's board of directors, but the bill does not affect the entitlement of a member serving on the district's board immediately before the bill's effective date to continue to carry out the board's functions for the remainder of the member's term. The bill revises the district's authority to convey certain roads and improvements to the state, a county, or a municipality for operation and maintenance and authorizes the district to own, operate, and maintain such roads and improvements. The bill removes a statutory provision authorizing the district to contract with a qualified party to provide law enforcement services in the district and instead establishes that the district may contract for or employ its own peace officers in the manner provided for a general law district. The bill changes the types of project delivery methods that may be used by the district.
C.S.H.B. 2343 sets out provisions relating to the district's authority to cause all or part of the district's territory to be removed from a district providing firefighting or emergency medical services. The bill establishes that the district has the general power and duty to adopt and enforce rules in the manner provided for a municipal management district. The bill removes statutory provisions relating to the district's dissolution and the effect of the dissolution on the district's debt and instead requires the district's board, on dissolution of the district, to determine whether the district's assets will escheat to the state or are transferred to a political subdivision of the state.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2343 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|