BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2524 |
By: Coleman |
County Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties explain that
a county or district attorney is required to provide a written opinion or
written advice on request of certain county or precinct officials relating to
the official's duties and assert that a county auditor should be considered a
county official for this purpose. These parties also contend that a county
auditor's duties sometimes expose the individual to a higher risk of legal
action over the interpretation of state law and other matters and that these
officials should be provided legal defense under certain circumstances.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2524 amends the Government Code to change the conditions under which a district or county attorney is required to respond to the request of a county or precinct official for a written opinion or written advice relating to the official duties of that official by setting a deadline of not later than the 30th day after the date a written request is submitted by which the district or county attorney is required to grant the request and provide the opinion or advice and by providing the option for the district or county attorney, by that deadline, to deny the request in writing or to provide written notification to the requestor that the opinion or advice cannot be provided by the deadline and specify a reasonable date by which the opinion or advice will be provided. The bill specifies that a request may include a request for interpretation of a statute relating to the official duties of the official. The bill entitles a county or precinct official that is sued for an action arising from the performance of a public duty as a result of following an opinion or advice to representation under Local Government Code provisions providing for the legal defense of a county official or employee that is sued. The bill establishes that a county or precinct official who requests and obtains legal advice and fails to implement the advice is not entitled to such representation in an action arising from that failure and requires the official to personally reimburse the county for any damages incurred by the county as a result of that failure. The bill specifies that "county official" includes a county auditor.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2524 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|