BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2590 |
By: Johnson |
Business & Industry |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties have observed instances of individuals using false deed documents to fraudulently sell properties they do not own to unsuspecting buyers. Some of these buyers spend money on renovations and mortgage payments for these homes, only to discover that they are not the legal owners. While victims of real estate fraud may file a suit under statutory provisions relating to real estate fraud, it has been noted that the victims are often deterred from doing so because of the time and money associated with such a suit. C.S.H.B. 2590 seeks to help protect the citizens of Texas from fraudulent real estate practices.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2590 amends the Business & Commerce Code to establish that a violation of statutory provisions governing fraud committed in a transaction involving real estate or stock is a false, misleading, or deceptive act or practice under the Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act and that any public remedy under that act is available for a violation of those statutory provisions. The bill establishes that it is the duty of city attorneys to lend the consumer protection division of the attorney general's office any reasonable assistance requested in the commencement and prosecution of actions under the bill's provisions. The bill authorizes a city attorney to institute or prosecute such an action to the same extent and in the same manner as a district or county attorney is authorized to institute or prosecute such an action. The bill requires 75 percent of any penalty recovered in an action brought by a district, county, or city attorney to be deposited in the general fund of the county or municipality in which the violation occurred.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2590 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|