BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2677 |
By: González, Mary |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
In an effort to respond to the few yet serious instances of abuse of a child with significant disabilities, interested parties believe that it would greatly benefit students with disabilities if school district or open-enrollment charter school staff members were required to undergo additional training on recognizing the signs of abuse of children with significant cognitive disabilities. C.S.H.B. 2677 seeks to provide for such training.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2677 amends the Education Code to include in the training concerning prevention techniques for and recognition of sexual abuse and all other maltreatment of children that is required of all new and existing school district and open-enrollment charter school employees as part of each school district's and open-enrollment charter school's mandatory policy for addressing sexual abuse and other maltreatment of children training specifically concerning prevention techniques for and recognition of sexual abuse and other maltreatment of children with significant cognitive disabilities in both educational and noneducational settings. The bill applies beginning with the 2015–2016 school year. |
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2677 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|