BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2762 |
By: Laubenberg |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties explain that petitions are used in Texas for a variety of reasons, including providing the opportunity for citizens to oppose measures passed by city government. The parties contend that this fundamental check on elected officials has been eroded in recent years due to the use of legal technicalities to invalidate petitions. The parties also contend that the time necessary to prepare a petition, collect signatures, and ensure that the petition meets the local standards necessary to be valid often exceeds the time allotted for preparation. Consequently, these parties assert that the petition process for addressing a local ordinance is often undermined by the very locality that passed and sought to protect the ordinance in question and that it has become necessary to clarify and protect the petition process to ensure accountability and protect this crucial aspect of democracy. C.S.H.B. 2762 seeks to provide for these clarifications and protections.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2762 amends the Local Government Code to require a petition regarding the repeal of a home-rule municipality's order, ordinance, or resolution to be filed not later than the 90th day after the later of the date on which the order, ordinance, or resolution finally passed or was published. The bill requires the secretary of the municipality or other authority responsible for verifying the signatures, if the secretary or other authority determines the petition contains an insufficient number of valid signatures, to state all the grounds for invalidating a signature. The bill prohibits the secretary or other authority, if a petition is invalidated and later refiled, from invalidating a subsequent petition on grounds that existed but were not raised during an earlier determination of the petition's validity. These provisions regarding the filing of a petition do not apply to a change in a provision of a municipal charter.
C.S.H.B. 2762 requires the municipality to make available on its official website, if one exists, a petition form that complies with state law and the municipality's ordinances, orders, and other resolutions that apply to the filing of a petition with the municipality. The bill prohibits the secretary of the municipality or other authority responsible for verifying the signatures from invalidating a petition because the petition did not contain information that the municipality's petition form failed to provide or to require to be provided.
C.S.H.B. 2762 amends the Election Code to make a conforming change.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2762 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|