BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2775 |
By: Rodriguez, Eddie |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that case law and recent court rulings regarding the filing and petition process for a candidate's place on the ballot should be incorporated into statute to avoid confusion and to ensure that candidates and affected eligible voters alike are able to easily find all applicable requirements of a petition and the petition process. C.S.H.B. 2775 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2775 amends the Election Code to specify that a single notarized affidavit by any person who obtained signatures for purposes of a candidate's petition filed in connection with an application for a place on the ballot is valid for all signatures gathered by the person if the date of notarization is on or after the date of the last signature obtained by the person. The bill authorizes a petition to be corrected and additional signatures presented to the appropriate authority after it has been initially filed but not after the deadline for filing the petition.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2775 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|