BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 2828 |
By: Phillips |
Homeland Security & Public Safety |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Many local governmental entities, such as a county office of emergency management, rely heavily on volunteer and contract support. Interested parties note, however, that the lack of clarity in the law as to whether a county or municipality may legally perform background checks on these volunteers and contract employees has raised concern about these entities' ability to filter out certain persons with a criminal history. C.S.H.B. 2828 seeks to address this concern.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2828 amends the Government Code to add to the individuals about whom a municipality or county, as applicable, is entitled to obtain from the Department of Public Safety (DPS) criminal history record information maintained by DPS an employee of the municipality or county, an applicant for employment by or an employee of a business or person that contracts with the municipality or county, a volunteer with the municipality or county, or an applicant for a volunteer position with the municipality or county.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2828 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|