BILL ANALYSIS |
|
C.S.H.B. 2913 |
|
By: Aycock |
|
County Affairs |
|
Committee Report (Substituted) |
|
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Medicaid programs are funded through a state or local government share combined with federal matching funds. Interested parties note that in recent years local governmental entities have been working with health care providers to supply the local funding necessary to draw the additional federal funds that Texas providers are currently entitled to receive for providing services to the Medicaid and uninsured population. The parties further note that hospitals in certain counties, such as Bell County, have agreed to the creation of a program to bring in additional federal Medicaid dollars. C.S.H.B. 2913 seeks to create such a program in order to allow more local control over funding for health care services.
|
||||||||
|
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
|
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
|
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 2913 amends the Health and Safety Code to set out provisions relating to county health care provider participation programs applicable to a county that is not served by a hospital district or a public hospital, in which a military base with more than 30,000 military personnel is partially located, and that has a population of more than 300,000. The bill establishes that such a program authorizes a county to collect a mandatory payment from each institutional health care provider located in the county to be deposited in a local provider participation fund established by the county and authorizes money in the fund to be used by the county to fund certain intergovernmental transfers and indigent care programs. The bill authorizes a county commissioners court to adopt an order authorizing a county to participate in the program, subject to certain limitations. The bill defines an "institutional health care provider" as a licensed nonpublic hospital.
C.S.H.B. 2913 authorizes a commissioners court to require a mandatory payment by an institutional health care provider in the county only in the manner provided by the bill's provisions, requires an affirmative vote of a majority of the members of the commissioners court for the county's authorization to collect that payment, and authorizes the commissioners court that has voted to require a mandatory payment to adopt related administrative rules.
C.S.H.B. 2913 requires a commissioners court that collects a mandatory payment to require each institutional health care provider to submit to the county a copy of any applicable financial and utilization data required by and reported to the Department of State Health Services and any related rules adopted by the executive commissioner of the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC). The bill authorizes the commissioners court to inspect an institutional health care provider's records to the extent necessary to ensure compliance with those requirements.
C.S.H.B. 2913 requires the commissioners court to hold an annual public hearing on the amounts of any mandatory payments that the commissioners court intends to require during the year and how the revenue derived from those payments is to be spent. The bill provides for notice of the hearing and entitles a representative of a paying hospital to be heard at the hearing regarding any matter related to the mandatory payments. The bill requires the commissioners court to designate by resolution one or more banks located in the county as the depository for the mandatory payments and specifies that such a bank serves for two years or until a successor is designated. The bill requires the deposit of all of the county's income derived from mandatory payments with that depository in the county's local provider participation fund, provides for withdrawals from the fund, and requires such funds to be secured in the manner provided for securing county funds.
C.S.H.B. 2913 requires each county that collects a mandatory payment to create a local provider participation fund that consists of all county revenue attributable to mandatory payments, money received from HHSC as a refund of an intergovernmental transfer from the county to the state for the purpose of providing the nonfederal share of Medicaid supplemental payment program payments, provided that the intergovernmental transfer does not receive a federal matching payment, and the earnings of the fund. The bill restricts the authorized uses of money deposited to the fund to funding intergovernmental transfers from the county to the state to provide the nonfederal share of a Medicaid supplemental payment program authorized under the state Medicaid plan, the Texas Healthcare Transformation and Quality Improvement Program federal waiver, or a successor waiver program authorizing similar Medicaid supplemental payment programs; subsidizing indigent programs; paying the administrative expenses of the county solely for activities under the bill's provisions; refunding a portion of a mandatory payment collected in error from a paying hospital; and refunding to paying hospitals the proportionate share of money received by the county from HHSC that is not used to fund the nonfederal share of Medicaid supplemental payment program payments. The bill prohibits money in the fund from being commingled with other county funds. The bill prohibits an applicable intergovernmental transfer of funds and any funds received by the county as a result of an intergovernmental transfer from being used by the county or any other entity to expand Medicaid eligibility under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
C.S.H.B. 2913 authorizes the commissioners court of a county that collects a mandatory payment to require an annual mandatory payment to be assessed quarterly on the net patient revenue of each institutional health care provider located in the county, sets out related provisions regarding the amounts to be set by the commissioners court for those mandatory payments, and caps the amount of the mandatory payment required of each paying hospital at an amount that, when added to the amount of the mandatory payments required from all other paying hospitals in the county, equals an amount of revenue that does not exceed six percent of the aggregate net patient revenue of all paying hospitals in the county. The bill requires the commissioners court to set, subject to that cap, the mandatory payments in amounts that in the aggregate will generate sufficient revenue to cover the administrative expenses of the county for activities under the bill's provisions, to fund the nonfederal share of a Medicaid supplemental payment program, and to pay for indigent programs but caps the amount of revenue from mandatory payments that may be used for such administrative expenses in a year at the lesser of four percent of the total revenue generated from the mandatory payment or $20,000. The bill prohibits the paying hospital from adding a mandatory payment as a surcharge to a patient.
C.S.H.B. 2913 provides for the assessment and collection of mandatory payments and establishes that interest, penalties, and discounts on mandatory payments are governed by the law applicable to county property taxes. The bill authorizes a county by rule to provide for an alternative provision or procedure that conforms to the requirements of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to the extent that any provision or procedure under the bill's provisions causes a mandatory payment to be ineligible for federal matching funds.
|
||||||||
|
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
|
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 2913 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|