BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3094 |
By: Parker |
Investments & Financial Services |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that there are technical corrections that need to be made to current law so that the Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner can effectively carry out its duties and oversight of the industries under its purview. C.S.H.B. 3094 seeks to address this issue by amending current statutes to clarify and update the duties and authority of the office.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3094 amends the Finance Code to clarify statutory provisions governing the confidentiality of information or material obtained or compiled by the consumer credit commissioner in relation to an examination or investigation by the commissioner and the commissioner's authority to disclose such information under certain circumstances by updating citations to the statutory authority for such examination or investigation.
C.S.H.B. 3094 subjects an order of restitution ordered by the consumer credit commissioner for certain violations to the notice, procedure, and enforcement provisions applicable to an administrative penalty imposed or recommended by the commissioner for certain violations. The bill requires the commissioner to approve the determination of a violation and impose the recommended penalty on a person's failure to make a timely written request for a hearing. The bill requires the commissioner to set a hearing on the penalty or restitution and give notice of the hearing only on such a timely written request and removes the requirement for the commissioner to set a hearing on the person's failure to give a timely response to the notice of the report on violation and penalty recommendations.
C.S.H.B. 3094 clarifies that a person who contracts for, charges, or receives a rate or amount of interest or time price differential under certain contracts for loans and financed transactions that exceeds the maximum applicable rate or amount authorized by applicable statutory provisions and the maximum applicable rate or amount authorized by statutory provisions relating to optional rate ceilings is subject to a penalty for that violation determined under certain statutory provisions establishing penalties and liabilities.
C.S.H.B. 3094 requires the interest charge for a consumer loan that is not secured by real property, if the interest charge is set at a rate or amount of interest computed using the true daily earnings method or the scheduled installment earnings method, to be contracted for, charged, or received using the scheduled installment earnings method or the true daily earnings method by applying the applicable daily rate to each part of the unpaid principal balance corresponding to the specified brackets for the actual or scheduled number of days during a payment period or by applying a single equivalent daily rate to the unpaid principal balance for the actual or scheduled number of days during a payment period, where the single equivalent daily rate is determined at the inception of the loan using the scheduled installment earnings method, and would earn an authorized amount of interest if the debt were paid to maturity according to the schedule of payments.
C.S.H.B. 3094 raises the cap on the processing fee charged to a retail buyer on return of a dishonored check given in payment for a retail charge agreement from $15 to the $30 maximum processing fee as provided in Business & Commerce Code provisions relating to a processing fee by the holder of a dishonored check, item, paper or electronic payment, or other payment device.
C.S.H.B. 3094 includes the price of accessories and the price of services related to a motor vehicle installment sale among those amounts that are considered itemized charges in a retail installment contract for a motor vehicle if the charges are not included in the cash price. The bill removes a charge for participation in a motor vehicle theft protection plan from charges authorized to be included in a retail installment contract for a motor vehicle and instead authorizes the inclusion of charges for participation in a vehicle protection product authorized under the Vehicle Protection Product Regulatory Act.
C.S.H.B. 3094 clarifies that a property owner is prohibited from waiving or limiting a requirement imposed on a property tax lender either under the Property Tax Lender License Act or under Tax Code provisions relating to tax liens and personal liability, except as specifically permitted by that act or those provisions.
C.S.H.B. 3094 requires a property tax lender to maintain a record of each property tax loan made under the Property Tax Lender License Act as necessary to enable the consumer credit commissioner to determine whether the lender is complying with that act. The bill requires a property tax lender to keep the record until the later of the fourth anniversary of the date of the property tax loan or the second anniversary of the date on which the final entry is made in the record. The bill requires a lender's property tax loan records to be prepared in accordance with accepted accounting practices. The bill requires the commissioner to accept a lender's system of records if the system discloses the information reasonably required to enable the commissioner to determine whether the lender is complying with the act. The bill requires the property tax lender to keep each obligation signed by a property owner at an office in Texas designated by the lender unless the obligation is transferred under an agreement that gives the commissioner access to the obligation.
C.S.H.B. 3094 repeals provisions requiring the Finance Commission of Texas to instruct the consumer credit commissioner to establish a program to address alternatives to high-cost lending in Texas, setting out the scope of the program, and requiring the commissioner to provide to the legislature an annual report.
C.S.H.B. 3094 amends the Finance Code and Occupations Code to condition the consumer credit commissioner's suspension or revocation of certain licenses and registrations on prior notice and an opportunity for a hearing without requiring an actual hearing, as applicable. The bill makes the requirement for the commissioner or a hearings officer to prescribe the time and place of a hearing on the revocation of the registration of a facilitator of tax refund anticipation loans or crafted precious metal dealer contingent on the facilitator or dealer making the written request for the hearing not later than the 20th day after the date the registrant receives the notice of a hearing.
C.S.H.B. 3094 amends the Finance Code and Tax Code to update references to certain federal agencies, federal regulations, and federal statutes in statutory provisions relating to certain consumer credit transactions to conform those provisions to changes in federal law.
C.S.H.B. 3094 repeals Sections 11.305(a), (b), and (c), Finance Code.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3094 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|