BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3131 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
Licensing & Administrative Procedures |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that recent revisions to state law relating to the disposition of a motor vehicle abandoned in a vehicle storage facility have led to inconsistencies in the law. In order to resolve these inconsistencies, C.S.H.B. 3131 seeks to amend the applicable law.
|
||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3131 amends the Occupations Code to specify that the operator of a vehicle storage facility, if a vehicle is not claimed by a person permitted to claim the vehicle before the 10th day after the date notice of the vehicle's receipt is mailed to the registered vehicle owner and primary lienholder or published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the vehicle is stored, is required to consider the vehicle to be abandoned and report the abandonment by certified mail or electronic certified mail to a law enforcement agency with jurisdiction where the vehicle is located. The bill requires the operator to pay the fee required by Transportation Code provisions relating to a garagekeeper's duty to report the abandonment of a motor vehicle. The bill authorizes the law enforcement agency to take custody of and dispose of the vehicle as provided by Transportation Code provisions relating to abandoned motor vehicles. The bill clarifies that the operator of a vehicle storage facility is required, on or after the 15th day after the date notice of the vehicle's receipt is mailed to the vehicle owner and primary lienholder or published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the vehicle is stored, to send a second notice to the registered owner and the primary lienholder of the vehicle if the facility has been notified that the law enforcement agency will not take custody of the vehicle or the law enforcement agency has not taken custody of the vehicle or has not responded to a report from the operator that the vehicle has been abandoned. The bill requires such second notice to be sent by certified mail or electronic certified mail.
C.S.H.B. 3131 establishes that, to the extent of any conflict between the Vehicle Storage Facility Act in the Occupations Code and Transportation Code provisions relating to abandoned motor vehicles, the Vehicle Storage Facility Act controls.
C.S.H.B. 3131 postpones from the 30th day after the date the second notice is mailed or published to the 31st day after the date the second notice is mailed or published the date after which the operator is authorized to dispose of the vehicle, if the vehicle is not claimed by a person entitled to claim the vehicle or taken into custody by the appropriate law enforcement agency. The bill establishes that, if the vehicle is not claimed by a person entitled to claim the vehicle within that time period, the owner or primary lienholder waives all rights and interests in the vehicle and consents to the sale of the vehicle at a public sale. The bill establishes that the purchaser of an abandoned vehicle takes title free and clear of all liens and claims of ownership, must receive a sales receipt from the vehicle storage facility, and is entitled to register the vehicle and receive a certificate of title from the appropriate authority. The bill removes a statutory provision requiring the proceeds from the sale of the vehicle at a public sale by an operator entitled to sell the vehicle to be applied to the incurred charges relating to the vehicle's storage and requiring the operator to pay any excess proceeds to the person entitled to those proceeds. The bill instead entitles a vehicle storage facility to reimbursement from the proceeds of the public sale of an abandoned vehicle for the cost of the public sale and for incurred charges for the towing of the vehicle and relating to the vehicle's storage. The bill requires the operator of the vehicle storage facility, after deducting such reimbursement, to hold the proceeds of the sale until the 90th day after the date of the sale for the owner or lienholder of the vehicle. The bill clarifies that the department to which the operator of a vehicle storage facility submits an application for disposal of an abandoned vehicle is the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles (TxDMV).
C.S.H.B. 3131 adds a temporary provision, set to expire September 1, 2016, and applicable only to a vehicle received by a vehicle storage facility before September 1, 2015, to authorize a facility, if an unclaimed abandoned vehicle is not claimed by a person who is entitled to claim the vehicle on or before the 120th day after the date the facility mailed or published the second notice to the registered owner and primary lienholder of the vehicle before September 1, 2015, to submit an application to TxDMV to dispose of the vehicle and to authorize the facility to dispose of the vehicle on approval of the application.
C.S.H.B. 3131 amends the Transportation Code to include an owner or operator of a vehicle storage facility in the definition of "garagekeeper," for purposes of statutory provisions relating to abandoned motor vehicles. The bill establishes that, to the extent of any conflict between Transportation Code provisions relating to abandoned motor vehicles and Occupations Code provisions relating to the practice by a holder of a license under the Vehicle Storage Facility Act, the Occupations Code provisions control for a vehicle stored in a vehicle storage facility.
|
||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3131 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||
|