BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3151 |
By: Smith |
Transportation |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The board of pilot commissioners for Harris County ports oversees the Houston Pilots, who are responsible for safely navigating ocean-going vessels into and out of the Port of Houston. Interested parties contend that while current law authorizes the board to investigate certain violations and incidents involving pilots, the law does not adequately provide for the authority to compel a party to provide related information. The parties also contend that there is a need to revise certain deadlines associated with rate hearings held by the board. C.S.H.B. 3151 seeks to address these issues.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3151 amends the Transportation Code to authorize the board of pilot commissioners for Harris County ports to direct the issuance of a subpoena commanding the person to whom it is directed to produce and permit inspection and copying of designated documents or tangible things in the possession, custody, or control of that person. The bill authorizes the board to file suit to enforce the subpoena, and an interested party to file suit for a protective order or other relief in connection with the subpoena, in a district court in Harris County or in a district court in the county in which the subpoena is served. The bill requires all such subpoenas issued and suits filed to be governed by the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and other law applicable to discovery in civil litigation in the district courts of Texas. The bill specifies that the rules the board is authorized to adopt under the Houston Pilots Licensing and Regulatory Act include rules for conducting hearings.
C.S.H.B. 3151 changes the date by which the board is required to set a hearing date for a pilotage rate change application from within two weeks of receipt of the application to not later than the 45th day after the receipt of the application. The bill removes the requirement of the board to hold the hearing not earlier than the 20th day and not later than the 40th day after the date the board sets the hearing date and instead requires the board to begin the hearing not earlier than the 20th day and not later than the 60th day after that date. The bill changes the deadline by which the pilots who are licensed or certified to serve the port for which the rates are being considered are required to submit certain financial information to the board and to any party designated by the board from the 10th day before the date set for the hearing to a date established by the board, which may not be later than the 10th day before the date set for the hearing. The bill adds the specification to the provision authorizing the board to require relevant additional information the board considers necessary to determine a proper pilotage rate that the required relevant information is from any person.
C.S.H.B. 3151 changes the date by which the board is required to issue a decision on a pilotage rate from not later than the 10th day after the date of the completion of a hearing on an application for a change in pilotage rates to not later than the 60th day after that date, specifies that the decision must be issued publicly, and removes the requirement that the decision be written. The bill includes the effective date for each new pilotage rate among the information required to be in the decision. The bill authorizes the board, before the effective date of a new pilotage rate, to continue or reopen the hearing at which the rate was decided to reconsider the decision.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3151 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|