BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3163 |
By: Cyrier |
Natural Resources |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that groundwater conservation districts are the state's preferred method of groundwater management and that the management of groundwater within a district involves complicated and controversial issues. The parties further note that sharply divergent viewpoints and expectations may sometimes arise and that lawsuits against districts and district directors have become a reality in this occasionally charged atmosphere. The parties assert that community volunteers who become public servants as district directors must engage in decision-making on behalf of a district free from intimidation and that exposure to claims of personal liability as a result of a decision constitutes a prior restraint on the faithful performance of a director and may even have a chilling effect on the willingness of citizens to serve as directors. C.S.H.B. 3163 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3163 amends the Water Code to establish that for liability purposes only a director of a groundwater conservation district is considered a district employee under the Texas Tort Claims Act even if the director does not receive fees of office voluntarily, by district policy, or through a statutory exception. The bill grants a director immunity from suit and immunity from liability for official votes and official actions.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3163 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|