BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3196 |
By: Miller, Doug |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Concern has been raised that current law does not explicitly recognize or provide adequate punishment for the offense of improper photography or visual recording, specifically relating to photographs taken with cell phone cameras without the consent of all parties. C.S.H.B. 3196 seeks to make the law more clear and address this issue by amending applicable law.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3196 amends the Penal Code to establish that knowingly is the requisite state of mind for the offense of improper photography or visual recording involving photographing, recording, broadcasting, or transmitting an improper visual image of another person without the other person's consent. The bill adds as conditions of the offense that the visual image be a visual image of the sexual or other intimate parts of another person or a visual image of another person engaged in sexual conduct and that the conduct occur when a reasonable person would believe that the person's sexual or other intimate parts or the person's sexual conduct would not be visible to the public. The bill removes from the conduct constituting the offense the conditions that the actor commits the offense with the intent to invade the privacy of the other person or arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person, depending on whether the offense is committed at a location in a bathroom or private dressing room.
C.S.H.B. 3196 establishes that, in a prosecution for an improper photography or visual recording offense, there is a rebuttable presumption that the actor's conduct is without the consent of the other person if one or more of the following circumstances are shown on the trial of the offense: · the actor compelled the other person to submit or participate by the use of physical force or violence or by threatening to use force or violence against the other person or another person and the other person believed that the actor had the ability to execute the threat; · the other person did not consent and the actor knew the other person was unconscious or physically unable to resist or knew the other person was unaware that the conduct was occurring; · the actor knew that as a result of mental disease or defect the other person was at the time of the offense incapable either of appraising the nature of the act or of resisting it; · the actor intentionally impaired the other person's power to appraise or control the other person's conduct by administering any substance without the other person's knowledge; · the actor was a public servant who coerced the other person to submit or participate; · the offense was accomplished by conduct that was hidden or conducted secretly or an attempt of such conduct, by conduct that used equipment such as a telephoto lens that allowed a visual image of another person's sexual or other intimate parts or another person's sexual conduct to be made, when such conduct would not ordinarily be visible to the public, or by deception, including misrepresenting how the photograph, recording, broadcast, or transmission would be used or disseminated; or · the victim of the offense was younger than 18 years of age at the time of the offense.
C.S.H.B. 3196 enhances the penalty for improper photography or visual recording from a state jail felony to a third degree felony if it is shown on the trial of the offense that the victim was younger than 18 years of age at the time of the offense. The bill establishes that, if conduct that constitutes the offense also constitutes another offense, the actor may be prosecuted for both offenses. The bill specifies that for purposes of conduct constituting the offense occurring in a bathroom or changing room, a sign or signs posted indicating that the person is being photographed or that a visual image of the person is being recorded, broadcast, or transmitted is not sufficient to negate the person's reasonable expectation that the person's sexual or other intimate parts or the person's sexual conduct would not be visible to the public.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3196 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|