BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3316 |
By: Miller, Doug |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested observers point out that the practice of filing of a durable power of attorney when a real estate transaction relies on that durable power of attorney to authorize one of the parties to execute the document has been generally successful. However, the observers point out that some chains of title have been broken by the untimely filing of the power of attorney. C.S.H.B. 3316 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3316 amends the Estates Code to make a real property transaction requiring the execution and delivery of instruments to be recorded voidable by any person if the required durable power of attorney for such a real property transaction is not filed for recording as required on or before the 10th day after the date the instrument to be recorded in connection with the transaction is filed for recording.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3316 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|