BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3395 |
By: Phillips |
Elections |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that many potential candidates for public office, especially at the local level, often pay filing fees for placement on the ballot for public office before a campaign treasurer has been appointed without realizing that it is illegal to do so. C.S.H.B. 3395 seeks to authorize such an expenditure.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3395 amends the Election Code to authorize a candidate to authorize a campaign expenditure made for the payment of a filing fee in connection with the candidate's application for a place on the ballot at a time when a campaign treasurer appointment for the candidate is not in effect. The bill requires a candidate to report such an expenditure on the first report required to be filed by the candidate for political reporting purposes.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3395 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|