BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3396 |
By: Phillips |
State Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that a single person may not make a direct campaign expenditure, such as buying an ad in a newspaper, of more than $100 without filing a campaign expenditure report with the Texas Ethics Commission. The parties assert that this low threshold is burdensome to average citizens in that it frequently requires a person to file a report in the course of exercising free speech. C.S.H.B. 3396 seeks to raise this reporting threshold.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3396 amends the Election Code to make the requirement that a person not acting in concert with another person who makes one or more direct campaign expenditures in an election from the person's own property comply with statutory political reporting requirements as if the person were the campaign treasurer of a general-purpose committee that does not file monthly reports applicable to such campaign expenditures that exceed $1,000.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3396 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|