BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3500 |
By: Thompson, Senfronia |
Criminal Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
While not all human trafficking is done for the purpose of sexual exploitation, and not all prostitution is the result of trafficking, the two are inarguably connected. Interested parties contend that studies routinely demonstrate that persons and children who are trafficked and forced to turn to prostitution, along with the disenfranchised youth who exchange sex for favors and get trapped in that lifestyle, are victims of sexual abuse who believe they have limited choices. These parties also note that some criminals reportedly consider sex trafficking and compelling prostitution to be more lucrative and a lower risk than other criminal activity. Most often it is the victims of trafficking, and not those who pay for their services, who are convicted and punished. Unfortunately, these convictions can hinder the ability of victims to fully move on with their lives, preventing a victim from finding gainful employment or proper housing or from attaining a proper education. C.S.H.B. 3500 seeks to provide some relief for victims of trafficking by establishing a judicial process to set aside certain convictions and a process for the expunction of those convictions for certain victims of trafficking convicted of prostitution.
|
||||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3500 amends the Code of Criminal Procedure to authorize a court in which a defendant has been convicted of a prostitution offense, if the court retains jurisdiction in the case, to hear a petition from the defendant to set aside the order of conviction. The bill requires the petition to allege specific facts that, if proved, would establish that the petitioner engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of an offense of trafficking of persons, continuous trafficking of persons, or compelling prostitution. The bill authorizes the petitioner to submit with the petition a document of a federal, state, local, or tribal governmental agency indicating that the petitioner engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution, as applicable. The bill requires the clerk of the court, on the filing of such a petition, to promptly serve a copy of the petition and any supporting document on the appropriate office of the attorney representing the state and requires any response to the petition by the attorney representing the state to be filed not later than the 20th business day after the date of service.
C.S.H.B. 3500 requires the court to order a hearing on the petition if the petitioner submits a document of a governmental agency as prescribed by the bill or if, in considering the petition, any supporting document, and any response of the attorney representing the state, the court finds that there are reasonable grounds to believe the facts alleged in the petition. The bill requires the court to dismiss the petition and to promptly notify the petitioner of the court's decision if the court finds that there are not any reasonable grounds to believe the alleged facts exist or if the petitioner has filed a previous petition to set aside such a conviction based solely on the same evidence. The bill prohibits a court from dismissing the petition if the petitioner submits a document of a governmental agency as prescribed by the bill and establishes that such a document creates a presumption that the petitioner's claim is true.
C.S.H.B. 3500 authorizes the court, after the court orders a hearing and as the court considers necessary to ensure a fair hearing on the petition, to order any discovery from the attorney representing the state or from the petitioner. The bill authorizes such a discovery order to include any order for probative evidence relevant to proving or disproving the petitioner's claim of having engaged in the prostitution conduct for which the person was convicted solely as a victim of trafficking of persons, continuous trafficking of persons, or compelling prostitution. The bill requires the court, if the court finds after ordering a hearing that, based on the petitioner's sworn statements or submitted evidence or affidavits, the petitioner is not represented by an attorney and is indigent, to appoint an attorney to represent the petitioner at the hearing and, if appropriate, before the court of appeals and the court of criminal appeals. The bill requires the court, at the conclusion of the hearing, to make a finding as to whether the petitioner's claim is true and authorizes the court to set aside the order of conviction for the prostitution offense if the court finds that the petitioner engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution and that setting aside the conviction is in the best interest of justice.
C.S.H.B. 3500 requires the court reporter to record a hearing to set aside such a conviction and, at the county's expense, to transcribe the hearing, including the finding, if the court makes a finding that the petitioner engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution and if the petitioner is indigent. The bill requires the entire record to be included with an application for appeal. The bill authorizes the petitioner and the attorney representing the state to appeal the findings of the court in the same manner as an appeal of a conviction in a criminal case. The bill establishes a filed petition for a finding that the petitioner engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution and a related proceeding do not constitute an application for a writ of habeas corpus or a proceeding based on an application for a writ of habeas corpus and exempts such a petition or proceeding from the restriction against filing a subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus. The bill establishes that its provisions relating to setting aside such a conviction are not intended to preclude a petitioner from receiving a reduction or termination of community supervision and a set-aside of verdict if the petitioner is otherwise statutorily qualified to receive such a dismissal. The bill establishes that the jurisdiction of a court in which a defendant has been convicted of a prostitution offense continues for a period of five years beginning on the date the conviction is entered.
C.S.H.B. 3500 authorizes a judge who dismisses proceedings against and discharges a defendant charged with prostitution to attach to the papers in the case a statement that the defendant engaged in the applicable conduct solely as a victim of an offense of trafficking of persons, continuous trafficking of persons, or compelling prostitution.
C.S.H.B. 3500 entitles a person who has been placed under a custodial or noncustodial arrest for commission of prostitution to have all records and files relating to the arrest expunged in the same manner provided for other persons entitled to expunction if a court determines that the person engaged in prostitution solely as a victim of trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution. The bill authorizes the court, if the attorney representing the state establishes a need for law enforcement agencies, for the purpose of investigating trafficking of persons or compelling prostitution offenses, to have access to evidence contained in the arrest records or files of a person entitled to such an expunction, at the request of the attorney representing the state, to provide in its expunction order that a law enforcement agency may retain those records and files, provided that the person's personal information has been redacted from those records and files.
|
||||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3500 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||||
|