BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3546 |
By: Meyer |
Public Education |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that the state standard for a public school student to obtain credit by examination for courses or for grade levels was, until recently, appropriately set. With the standards now reduced, the parties note that some school districts are experiencing an increased demand for such testing. Additionally, some students who are meeting the reduced requirement are struggling in the subsequent course. C.S.H.B. 3546 seeks to remedy this situation by allowing school districts to control the passing standards for their students.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3546 amends the Education Code to authorize a school district's board of trustees to establish a minimum required score for each section of an examination for primary school grade level acceleration or an examination for high school academic subject credit approved by the board that is higher than certain existing minimum required scores for such examinations. The bill prohibits a minimum required score established by a district board of trustees from being greater than a score in the 90th percentile and requires such a minimum score to be established before the beginning of a school year for examinations to be administered in the school year and to apply for at least the entire school year. The bill's provisions apply beginning with the 2015–2016 school year.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3546 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|