BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3567 |
By: Sanford |
State Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that certain religious organizations and individuals should not be required to solemnize a marriage that violates a sincerely held religious belief and that religious organizations should have the protections necessary to continue conducting marriages that are in accord with such a belief. C.S.H.B. 3567 seeks to establish this protection.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3567 amends the Family Code to prohibit a religious organization, an organization supervised or controlled by or in connection with a religious organization, an individual employed by a religious organization while acting in the scope of that employment, or a clergy or minister from being required to solemnize any marriage, or provide services, accommodations, facilities, goods, or privileges for a purpose related to the solemnization, formation, or celebration of any marriage if the action would cause the organization or individual to violate a sincerely held religious belief.
C.S.H.B. 3567 establishes that a refusal to provide such services, accommodations, facilities, goods, or privileges is not the basis for a civil or criminal cause of action or any other action by the state or a political subdivision of the state to penalize or withhold benefits or privileges, including tax exemptions or governmental contracts, grants, or licenses, from any protected organization or individual.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3567 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|