BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3711 |
By: Márquez |
Urban Affairs |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties have raised concerns regarding arbitration proceedings under The Fire and Police Employee Relations Act and, specifically, the lack of authority of an arbitrator or hearing officer to administer oaths and subpoena documents and witnesses at the request of a party to the arbitration or such a party's designee. C.S.H.B. 3711 seeks to provide a framework for this authority.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill expressly does one or more of the following: creates a criminal offense, increases the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or changes the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3711 amends the Local Government Code to establish that an arbitrator or hearing officer authorized to hear a grievance proceeding under a collective bargaining agreement under The Fire and Police Employee Relations Act has the authority to administer oaths and issue subpoenas in the manner and to the extent authorized for an arbitration board under that act. The bill establishes that a person who is actively engaged in providing representation to a party to the proceeding and notes and other documents prepared by that person in the scope of the person's representation are not subject to a subpoena issued by such an arbitrator or hearing officer. The bill requires a request for a subpoena by such an arbitrator or hearing officer to be made not later than the 10th day before the date the proceeding will be held, except for good cause shown. The bill establishes that an oath administered by such an arbitrator or hearing officer has the same force and effect as an oath administered by a magistrate in the magistrate's judicial capacity and that a response to a subpoena duces tecum under these provisions is considered to have been made under oath.
C.S.H.B. 3711 makes it a misdemeanor offense punishable by a fine up to $1,000, confinement in the county jail for not more than 30 days, or both the fine and confinement if a person who is subpoenaed by such an arbitrator or hearing officer fails to appear as required by the subpoena.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3711 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|