BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3718 |
By: Spitzer |
Homeland Security & Public Safety |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties note that the state owns a significant amount of generally unused land in certain areas near the Texas-Mexico border. The parties further note that Texas military forces have expressed a need for a new facility near the border as a staging area for border security efforts. These parties assert that, if it is feasible to use state-owned land, the costs of the new facility would be significantly lower without a land purchase. C.S.H.B. 3718 seeks to explore meeting this need in a manner that is affordable to the state.
|
||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3718 requires the General Land Office (GLO) to evaluate the possible use of state-owned land within 25 miles of the Texas-Mexico border or inside the cattle fever tick permanent quarantine line for purposes of border security and to evaluate the possible use of the land as a staging area for law enforcement operations, for additional facilities for the Texas National Guard, and for the physical security of the Texas-Mexico border. The bill requires the GLO, not later than September 1, 2016, to submit a report on the results of the evaluation and any resulting recommendations to the governor, the lieutenant governor, and the members of the legislature.
|
||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3718 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||
|