BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3747 |
By: Phillips |
Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Interested parties contend that retired federal judges should be able to apply for a concealed handgun license under the same conditions as other retired judicial officers. C.S.H.B. 3747 seeks to address this issue.
|
||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3747 amends the Government Code to include a retired federal judge who is a Texas resident among the persons who are considered to be retired judicial officers for purposes of statutory provisions relating to the eligibility of a retired judicial officer for a concealed handgun license. The bill defines "federal judge" as a judge of a United States court of appeals, a judge of a United States district court, a judge of a United States bankruptcy court, or a magistrate judge of a United States district court. The bill clarifies that the special appointed judges considered to be retired judicial officers for purposes of those provisions are visiting judges.
|
||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
On passage, or, if the bill does not receive the necessary vote, September 1, 2015.
|
||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3747 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||
|