BILL ANALYSIS |
C.S.H.B. 3876 |
By: Workman |
Land & Resource Management |
Committee Report (Substituted) |
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Real estate development projects often span many years from the time the subdivision plat is first approved until the last lot in a commercial or residential subdivision is built. Interested parties note that if the regulations of the political subdivision change before the project is completed, the incomplete lots may be rendered unbuildable. The parties note that there are certain laws meant to protect such projects from shifting regulations but assert that the laws do not sufficiently address denials for applications for protection under such laws. C.S.H.B. 3876 seeks, among other things, to prevent applicants from being unfairly denied that protection.
|
||||||||||
CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPACT
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly create a criminal offense, increase the punishment for an existing criminal offense or category of offenses, or change the eligibility of a person for community supervision, parole, or mandatory supervision.
|
||||||||||
RULEMAKING AUTHORITY
It is the committee's opinion that this bill does not expressly grant any additional rulemaking authority to a state officer, department, agency, or institution.
|
||||||||||
ANALYSIS
C.S.H.B. 3876 amends the Local Government Code to authorize an applicant for a local permit for construction related to, or provision of, service from certain water or wastewater utilities associated with a regulatory agency of a political subdivision or another form of authorization required for certain actions on regulated projects for which the permit is sought to request, by written notice to the chief administrative law judge of the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) and the applicable regulatory agency, mediation of a dispute arising out of a regulatory agency's determination that statutory provisions relating to the issuance of local permits do not apply to the applicant's project. The bill establishes that, except as otherwise provided by the bill's provisions, Civil Practice and Remedies Code provisions relating to alternative dispute resolution procedures govern the mediation. The bill requires the chief administrative law judge to appoint a mediator from a list of qualified mediators maintained by SOAH through random assignment and to give notice to the parties in writing and authorizes the parties to substitute a mediator of their choice in place of the appointed mediator not later than the seventh day after the date of the appointment. The bill entitles the mediator to a reasonable fee, due at the time mediation convenes, and requires the fee to be borne equally by the parties unless the parties agree otherwise.
C.S.H.B. 3876 requires the parties to cooperate with the mediator in setting the date, time, and place of the mediation and requires the mediation to be convened and completed not later than the 30th day after the date of the applicant's written notice. The bill requires the mediator, if the parties fail to agree on a date, time, or place for the mediation, to unilaterally set the date, time, and place of the mediation so that the mediation is convened and completed in the 30-day period. The bill requires an authorized representative of each party with authority to settle the dispute to be physically present at the mediation. The bill establishes that the failure by a party to attend and participate in mediation is considered a default, entitling the other party to the party's requested relief and reserving only the issue of any attorney's fees or damages otherwise legally permitted, and the bill requires such fees or damages to be determined by an administrative law judge of SOAH after a hearing to which each party is given notice. The bill requires additional rules governing the conduct of the mediation to be provided by the mediator consistent with the bill's provisions and Civil Practice and Remedies Code provisions relating to alternative dispute resolution procedures. The bill requires any dispute arising out of the procedure in convening the mediation to be determined by an administrative law judge assigned by SOAH on the request of a party with written notice to the other party. The bill caps at $250 a fee imposed by a regulatory agency to review an application for determination of the applicability of statutory provisions relating to the issuance of local permits to the permit applicant's project.
C.S.H.B. 3876 makes a political subdivision that has been found by a court to have violated statutory provisions relating to the issuance of local permits liable for the permit applicant's attorney's fees and administrative and court costs and the applicant's portion of the cost of any mediation the applicant requested that did not result in an agreement.
|
||||||||||
EFFECTIVE DATE
September 1, 2015.
|
||||||||||
COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL AND SUBSTITUTE
While C.S.H.B. 3876 may differ from the original in minor or nonsubstantive ways, the following comparison is organized and formatted in a manner that indicates the substantial differences between the introduced and committee substitute versions of the bill.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|